- All articles

All articles

- TWIBS: Kristi Noem Sued by Trans TSA Officer

- Susan’s Place Avoids Shutting Down

- What Future for Trans Media?

- Transgender and Intersex Athletes May be Banned from the Olympics Next Year

- Corporate Media’s Queer Purge

- An Immediate Need to Impose Bigotry: Rogue Court Endorses Trump’s Ideology

NOV 14, 2025, 6:00 AM EST | ALYSSA STEINSIEK | SOURCE

TWIBS: Kristi Noem Sued by Trans TSA Officer

A trans TSA officer is suing head of DHS Kristi Noem over a policy that prevents the officer from doing her job just because she’s trans.

Humor by Aly Gibbs

This Week in Barrel Scraping (TWIBS) is Assigned Media’s longest running column! Every Friday, Aly Gibbs digs deep from the well of transphobia and finds the most obnoxious, goofy thing transphobes have said or obsessed over during the week and tears it to shreds.

I absolutely love when my job reporting on transphobia directly intersects with my passionate hobby of despising specific people to a degree that my greatest haters have described as unhealthy, toxic, and downright weird.

Thanks to a Tuesday article by The Independent, we’ve learned that a transgender TSA officer, Danielle Mittereder, has filed suit against former governor of South Dakota and current head of the Department of Homeland Security, Kristi Noem.

I think it’s fair to say that I hate every single member of the current Executive regime. Frankly, anybody who doesn’t is deeply suspicious. I can forgive you for finding Trump 1 toadies like The Moochster amusing. Heck, who amongst us wasn’t positively wheezing at Big Rudy G’s melting hair line?

But it must be said, unequivocally, that absolutely nobody in Trump 2’s cabinet is any fun at all. They are, in fact, horrible ghouls to a man. My ire with Noem in particular is both long and storied, but the highlights are: Kristi Noem enjoys murdering puppies; heads a domestic terrorist organization that’s criminally kidnapping innocent Americans (and non-Americans); and is so blatantly anti-indigenous and racist that she was, for a time, banned from entering over 12% of the state she governed.

Suffice it to say, I hate this bitch! So it brings me great joy to see a trans woman sue Noem’s pants off, of course.

Mittereder’s complaints are many, but arise from a single problem: She is transgender, and Trump’s Executive Order 14168 declared that the United States government would no longer acknowledge transgender people. As a result, the TSA has amended its rules regarding patdowns, which initially stated that an officer “of the same gender must conduct a full-body pat-down of the passenger in order to clear them to go through the checkpoint,” to instead outright ban trans TSA officers from performing patdowns.

This has created incredible friction in Mittereder’s professional life. Initially out as trans to only two of her superiors, she has since had to repeatedly out herself to coworkers and strangers to explain why she can’t perform patdowns. Furthermore, as a “limited duty” officer, Mittereder is ineligible for shift swaps and overtime, and cannot use the women’s locker room at work.

“As a result of Defendant’s discrimination, [Mittereder] suffered and continues to suffer anxiety, depression, fear, feelings of uncertainty, crying spells, grief, and low mood,” the lawsuit says. “[She] experienced and continues to experience anger, frustration, embarrassment, and humiliation as a result of Defendant’s decision to prohibit her from doing much of her job, single her out, and stigmatize her due to her gender identity.”

Truthfully, I have a lot of beef with the TSA. Transgender passengers have been harassed by TSA officers for years, and in past internal investigations, the organization hasn’t done a particularly good job at keeping travelers safe to begin with. I’m not convinced that the organization should even exist, but as long as it does, its employees should be treated equitably and fairly. The humiliation and harassment Mittereder has received for simply being transgender is disgusting and inexcusable.

Here’s hoping for a swift and decisive legal defeat that makes Kristi Noem cry and scream a whole bunch.

Aly Gibbs (She/They) is a trans writer who reports on news important to the queer community.

This article was downloaded from https://www.assignedmedia.org/breaking-news/twibs-kristi-noem-sued at Nov 14, 2025, 11:29 AM EST.

NOV 13, 2025, 3:04 PM EST | ALYSSA STEINSIEK | SOURCE

Susan’s Place Avoids Shutting Down

A long-time forum for trans people, Susan’s Place, received the donations it needs to keep operating after a desperate plea for help.

by Aly Gibbs

Susan’s Place, a forum created thirty years ago for transgender people to share information amongst each other and socialize, narrowly avoided shutting down due to lack of funds earlier this week.

Founded in 1995 by Susan Larson, the web forum was initially created to replace the web chat function on another popular transgender forum. By 2015, the website was visited by millions annually, and hosted thousands of conversations moderated by a team of more than eighty volunteers. As traditional forums waned in popularity, places like Reddit and Twitter (and, more recently, Bluesky) became hubs of activity for younger trans people online, while Susan’s Place retained an older user base.

Larson has said that she has received countless messages of thanks from users over the years, some of whom say that the website saved their lives, either through information and resources or the direct support of other users and moderators. That certainly seems likely, given the general lack of knowledge regarding trans people, medical transition, and the trans community in the 1990s and 2000s.

Unfortunately, Susan’s Place was not a helpful space for all trans people.

Trans people on other websites, when asked why they disliked Susan’s Place, have suggested that the forum’s restrictions on topics such as DIY hormone therapy and overall preference towards older binary trans women are unappealing. Many people have also said that Larson’s frequent fundraising requests are offputting. Larson herself has said that the forum, which she built and maintains herself, is also her primary source of income.

Larson even took to Reddit herself, once, to engage with users of the subreddit r/asktransgender. Larson’s original post has since been deleted, but many of her comments can still be seen throughout the thread, striking a combative tone with naysayers who came forward with critiques of Susan’s Place.

Other posts in the thread make accusations of “cliquey” behavior and toxicity that has harmed younger users. One user claimed that Larson had posted a link to the thread on Susan’s Place and insisted that her users follow her there to support her against “an ongoing slander campaign,” a practice discouraged as brigading by Redditors.

In her plea for donations (which has since been removed and replaced by an announcement declaring that the forum is saved), Larson mentioned that the COVID-19 pandemic brought donations to the website to a standstill, and a massive data loss a few years later was the final nail in the coffin. In her latest announcement, she says enough donations have come in to keep the site up for “the next several months.”

“For the first time since 2020, it feels like an elephant has finally climbed off my back. I can stand up straight, breathe, and feel a moment of peace. You didn't just save a website—you lifted a ton of stress that has been pressing on my shoulders for years. The sleepless nights, the constant worry about whether we'd make it one more month—it's gone, at least for now. You gave me—and all of us—room to hope again,” Larson’s update reads. “This community is my family. For nearly 30 years, you've reminded me why I keep going: because we look out for one another. If you've ever found hope, comfort, or family here, please consider joining the circle of people making sure Susan's Place is here for the next generation, too.”

Susan’s Place, and Larson herself, have been polarizing figures in the trans community for over a decade. Even Larson’s staunchest haters attest to the forum’s wealth of helpful knowledge on trans surgeries; many years of experiences and results are accrued on the forum, while similar information is often scrubbed from websites like Reddit or Twitter for various reasons. At the same time, accusations of transmedicalism and transfemme exclusivity don’t seem to be entirely unfounded, and plenty of people have their own horror stories about Susan’s Place.

Regardless, it seems like Larson’s forum is here to stay, for the time being. Perhaps it’s a good thing that we haven’t lost one more refuge for trans folks, no matter how controversial it can be, given the rising tide of hatred for our community.

Aly Gibbs (She/They) is a trans writer who reports on news important to the queer community.

This article was downloaded from https://www.assignedmedia.org/breaking-news/susans-place at Nov 14, 2025, 11:29 AM EST.

NOV 13, 2025, 6:31 AM EST | ASSIGNED | SOURCE

What Future for Trans Media?

An upcoming event for trans journalists hopes to provide a touchstone for media workers caught in the maelstrom.

by Valorie Van-DIeman

On Friday and Saturday, November 14th and 15th, The Objective, a nonprofit that covers diversity and representation in media, will host Trans Media Convening, a virtual conference for people interested in media and journalism of  trans issues. Organizers say the event is a response to  increasing hostility facing trans people in the media—something that has only escalated in recent weeks with layoffs of trans and queer journalists at Teen Vogue and NBC Out.

The event is organized by James Salanga of the Objective with an advisory council of six other trans people in media and journalism. (Disclosure: Assigned Media founder Evan Urquhart was part of the advisory council.)

In an interview, Salanga explained that the  event is intended to bring together trans journalists and allies interested in covering trans issues. “It feels like an urgent time to just figure out how to meet with other trans journalists across the country, especially because coverage is not so regionally specific. It can never really be a monolith, even as we're talking about the impact of national anti trans legislation or transphobia across the country. It just looks so different in different pockets of the US,” they said.

The event is free because financial accessibility was a core concern. “A lot of these panels and these discussions happen at conferences that cost an arm and a leg to try and get to,” Salanga said.

Another key goal was improving educational accessibility in journalism. “I think that it's really hard to find your footing and to find other journalists when you didn't go to a school with a major journalism program,” Salanga said. “Traditionally trained journalists have their own way of speaking that you’ve got to learn.”

The core of the Trans Media Convening will be two panels: one on workplace solidarity moderated by former Teen Vogue politics editor Lex McMenamin; and another on narrative change, moderated by V Starks, a documentarian for the Southern Memory Workers Collective.

When asked about the workplace solidarity panel, Salanga said “A lot of people will hopefully be thinking about the loss of Teen Vogue in terms of political coverage. Because Lex and Allegra Kirkland, who were kind of the leaders of the politics section of Teen Vogue, were doing a lot of really solid work to take youth, and specifically trans youth, really seriously when it came to political attacks on their rights..”

This  year has seen dramatic rollbacks of progressive policies across America, with LGBTQIA+ people and especially trans people targeted. “It's bad for all of journalism to see this retreat of these 2020 promises around inclusion and equality, especially when it comes to trans people,” Salanga said, “I'm hoping people will take away from this that we need each other.”

In the midst of these policy  reversals, major news organizations have failed to cover trans issues in an informed or responsible way. On the value of quality coverage, Salanga said, “I am pretty cynical about the reform of juggernauts like the New York Times, but I am really hopeful about other forms of independent media and other movement journalists that have been trying to create this alternative media ecosystem.”

As attacks on trans Americans by the Trump regime escalate, it’s more critical than ever for people in journalism and media to have a clear understanding of trans people and trans issues. To that end, Salanga said, “In this political climate, when less than 1/3 of people in America know a trans person personally, really thoughtful reporting can make such a big difference.”

Valorie Van-Dieman (she/they) is the Associate Editor at Assigned Media. Find her on Bluesky @valorievandieman.bsky.social

This article was downloaded from https://www.assignedmedia.org/breaking-news/objective-trans-media-convening at Nov 14, 2025, 11:29 AM EST.

NOV 12, 2025, 6:00 AM EST | ALYSSA STEINSIEK | SOURCE

Transgender and Intersex Athletes May be Banned from the Olympics Next Year

The Times reports that an inside source has told them that the new president of the International Olympic Committee, Kirsty Coventry, may ban trans and intersex athletes from the Olympics.

by Aly Gibbs

The Times reports that a source has told them the International Olympic Committee will be banning all transgender women and intersex athletes from competing in the Olympics as soon as February of next year. This is a somewhat shocking turn of events. No, not because of the discrimination against trans and intersex people, which becomes less surprising by the day, but because it would necessitate the IOC quit being cowards and embrace their bigotry.

If you aren’t familiar, the IOC already has a history of waffling on trans competitors.

In 2003, they drafted their first set of rules for trans athletes who wanted to compete in the Olympics. These rules necessitated that the athletes had undergone sexual reassignment surgery, showed legal recognition of their new gender, and advised that they undergo hormone therapy for at least two years.

In 2015, the IOC acknowledged that legal recognition of gender transition isn’t possible in every country, and that requiring invasive surgery might not be entirely fair. They changed the participation rules so that trans men could compete without qualification, and trans women could compete as long as their gender had been declared female for at least four years, and their testosterone levels were kept below 10 nanomoles per liter for at least one year prior to competing.

Then, in 2021, the IOC threw their hands up and passed the buck to the individual governing bodies for each Olympic sport. As a result, trans athletes were banned from many Olympic sports.

Now, it seems, the IOC is set to outright ban anybody they deem abnormal from competing, thanks to two meddling white women. According to The Times’ source, Dr. Jane Thornton presented a “very scientific, factual and unemotional presentation” to the IOC about why transgender and intersex athletes are icky and gross, and shouldn’t be allowed to compete against real women.

I find that hard to believe, since the science that I’m aware of suggests that trans women are largely disadvantaged at sports post-transition, as compared to cis women. Meanwhile, I’m not sure how any presentation could make a case for blanket banning every intersex athlete, considering the huge variety in intersex disorders… but The Times’ slack-jawed dull-eyed Chief Sports Reporter Martyn Ziegler erroneously describes intersex women as “those who were raised as girls from birth but have male chromosomes and male levels of testosterone,” which suggests his head is wedged so firmly up his ass that he no longer knows up from down, so perhaps we shouldn’t be surprised.

Kirsty Coventry was elected president of the IOC earlier this year, and almost immediately signaled her hatred for transgender women. The blue-eyed, pale-skinned, bottle blonde Zimbabwean said in June: “We understand there will be differences depending on the sports.

We should make the effort to place emphasis on the protection of the female category and we should ensure that this is done in consensus with all the stakeholders. But we need to do that with a scientific approach and the inclusion of the international federations who have already done a lot of work in this area”

Of course, it seems like what Coventry and her cabal of soulless crackers are after is the exact opposite of a scientific approach. Instead, they’re ignoring the actual science to cherry pick whatever outdated data they can find that justifies a prohibition on anybody they think is gross from competing in the Olympics.

Every single day, it seems, the IOC undermines their own insistence that sport is a human right. Now, they’re poised to enact a bigoted anti-trans policy at the most elite levels of athletic competition, ensuring that anybody who isn’t quite like them suffers as much as possible for the crime of being born different.

It disgusts me, and I hope it disgusts you.

Aly Gibbs (She/They) is a trans writer who reports on news important to the queer community.

This article was downloaded from https://www.assignedmedia.org/breaking-news/trans-banned-olympics at Nov 14, 2025, 11:29 AM EST.

NOV 11, 2025, 8:59 AM EST | ASSIGNED | SOURCE

Corporate Media’s Queer Purge

It’s no coincidence that historic assaults on trans and queer people’s rights have been accompanied by the mainstream media’s widespread dismissal of LGBTQ+ journalists and the elimination of beats devoted to our lives.

Opinion, by Billie Jean Sweeney

The most dramatic rollback of human rights for trans people in a generation will be covered by a mainstream corporate press that has purged queer journalists from its ranks in a stunningly transparent series of politicized moves over the past month.

The Supreme’s Court’s decision last week to allow the Trump administration to unilaterally impose its hateful gender ideology on passports, before the issue had even been adjudicated in lower courts, will have cascading repercussions for trans people for years to come. At the same time, radical right-wing groups such as Liberty Counsel and the Alliance Defending Freedom have pledged to continue their efforts to overturn marriage equality and legalize the odious practice of conversion therapy.

This wave of bigotry comes as mainstream corporate media, already in the grips of a harsh rightward shift, has explicitly targeted queer journalists in new cutbacks and eliminated the rare platforms that covered queer people with sufficient knowledge, context and framing.

“Fewer and fewer national news outlets have teams dedicated to LGBTQ+ rights coverage, but anti-trans legislative activity is at its highest peak in 200 years,” said Kae Petrin, president of the nonprofit Trans Journalists Association, citing legislative research from Stanford. “Each contraction of resources for journalists covering these topics is a huge loss for public information and a huge loss for journalism, especially since these outlets have wide reach and longstanding public trust at a time that trust for national news is dwindling.”

Gone now is Teen Vogue, a trailblazing venue for young queer writers that regularly explored political policies from LGBTQ+ perspectives. Corporate parent Condé Nast also eliminated several staff jobs, most of them held by trans people or women of color — and then fired four more staffers, one of them trans, who sought to question an executive about its decisions.

Also eradicated in the recent purges was the award-winning NBC Out, one of earliest mainstream platforms to focus on trans issues. Rich Ferraro of GLAAD called NBC’s move “part of a dangerous pattern of mainstream media outlets choosing to lose trusted and talented journalists who focus on important LGBTQ news that otherwise is under-reported or not reported at all.”

Even before the firings, the mainstream corporate press had been failing so miserably in its obligation to fairly cover trans people that it typically doesn’t take the most fundamental journalistic step of all: Seek out and include our perspectives.

A new report from the Trans Journalists Association, which partnered with researchers at Berkeley Media Studies Group, analyzed coverage by major news outlets of the long stream of anti-trans decrees that Trump signed during his first 100 days in office.

“Within the sample’s articles,” its analysis found, “70 percent did not include a quote from a single trans person. Instead, journalists turned to cisgender sources — mostly government officials — to speak about trans people, their lives, and how they would be affected.”

Although young trans people were most frequently and viciously targeted by Trump, the report found that “transgender youth under 20 were quoted in just 6 percent of articles.”

Who did mainstream corporate media turn to? Trump, a member of his administration, or other Republicans were quoted in 50 percent of articles; Democrats were quoted in 32 percent of articles. Organizations that represent trans people were quoted in 24 percent of articles.

“It's important to speak to trans people not just as victims of policies that target us but as experts who can shape public understanding of the consequences and broader import of government actions, or even just as individuals with lived experience who see policies as they affect us. Those perspectives shouldn't just be sources or quotes, but can also serve as scaffolding as you decide how to frame your journalism,” TJA’s Petrin said in an interview with Assigned Media.

“If we do not quote the people who will live with the consequences of Trump’s rhetoric and actions,” the TJA report said, “journalism is failing to inform the public.”

This same basic failure was documented specifically in New York Times coverage in a 2024 report by Media Matters for America, which found the organization didn’t quote a single trans person in 66 percent of its stories on trans issues.

The New York Times, whose news coverage has spread anti-trans disinformation and sought to legitimize anti-trans bigotry, also discriminates in its staffing decisions. No trans news journalist is assigned to cover political issues involving trans people — a de facto prohibition that has existed for at least five years.

The increasing escalation of these types of anti-queer staffing decisions is set against a wider backdrop of new and astonishingly regressive discrimination against women and people of color at mainstream news organizations.

The Washington Post, whose owner has become a very public Trump patron, abruptly fired its only Black staff opinion writer, Karen Attiah, for social media posts that sought to put Charlie Kirk’s killing in the context of the nation’s broader political culture. Attiah, a veteran, award-winning staffer, was also the founding editor of the Post’s widely praised Global Opinions section.

At CBS, the new owner David Ellison made good on his pledge to Trump to eliminate diverse perspectives, disbanding the network’s race and culture unit that was set up after George Floyd’s killing. CBS, whose news operations are now led by the right-wing culture warrior Bari Weiss, also dismissed eight on-air correspondents, all of them women and half of them people of color.

Where can readers turn to detect bias in mainstream corporate coverage, and evaluate whether what they see is, in fact, true? “The Truth in Journalism Project and News Literacy Project both offer great resources for evaluating what you're seeing,” Petrin said. “Poynter has some self-directed courses to help build these skills.” Petrin also pointed to tools offered by the Digital Inquiry Group and CTRL-F.

But the future of a free press in the United States, one that’s not a compliant tool of government and is based on factual reporting, will ultimately rest with independent journalists themselves.

“My silver lining is that worker-run outlets and nonprofit newsrooms have sprung out of past mass layoffs,” Petrin said, “and many of those journalists have been able to continue their work. I hope we continue to see this kind of resilience, adaptation, and rethinking of journalistic models.”

Billie Jean Sweeney (she/her) is a freelance editor, reporter and advocate. She helped direct international news coverage for The New York Times and coverage of New York City for The Associated Press. She also served as editorial director of the Committee to Protect Journalists, where she defended international press freedom. At The Hartford Courant she led an award-winning investigation into the deadly use of restraints in mental health institutions. For Assigned Media, she’s written about the right wing’s attacks on young trans athletes and how mainstream media adopted and spread anti-trans disinformation.

This article was downloaded from https://www.assignedmedia.org/breaking-news/trans-queer-firings-nbc-conde-nast-nyt at Nov 14, 2025, 11:29 AM EST.

NOV 10, 2025, 7:32 AM EST | ASSIGNED | SOURCE

An Immediate Need to Impose Bigotry: Rogue Court Endorses Trump’s Ideology

Leading Off: Millions of trans Americans and their families are contending with the harmful and far-reaching implications of the justices’ endorsement of passport bias. Only the ballot box, as a Pennsylvania town demonstrated, offers an answer.

by Valorie Van-Dieman and Billie Jean Sweeney

Trans people across the United States begin the week grappling with the implications of the Supreme Court’s decision to allow Donald Trump to impose his ideologically driven requirement that passports display a person’s “biological sex.” Lower courts have yet to fully adjudicate the issue, but the justices stepped in and endorsed what New York Times columnist M. Gessen called Trump’s “campaign to force trans people out of public life — by executive-ordering us out of existence.”

The harmful ramifications are immediate, direct and far reaching for the nearly 3 million Americans who are transgender. “Forcing transgender people to carry passports that out them against their will increases the risk that they will face harassment and violence and adds to the considerable barriers they already face in securing freedom, safety, and acceptance,” said Jon Davidson, senior counsel for the ACLU’s LGBTQ & HIV Project.

Yet the consequences go further still, affecting millions more. The ACLU’s Chase Strangio told PBS in February that Trump’s order “opens the door to sex-based policing that cannot be enforced without subjecting everyone to some sort of scrutiny, to some sort of invasive process that will harm us all.”

The justices effectively reversed lower court decisions that had been pending, waving through the president’s campaign of bigotry without demanding the administration demonstrate any immediate need.

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, who wrote a dissenting opinion for the Democratic-appointed justices, including Elena Kagan, and Sonia Sotomayor, called the majority’s unsigned ruling a “pointless but painful perversion of our equitable discretion.”

“The Government seeks to enforce a questionably legal new policy immediately,” she wrote, “but it offers no evidence that it will suffer any harm if it is temporarily enjoined from doing so, while the plaintiffs will be subject to imminent, concrete injury if the policy goes into effect.”

Trump’s gender-binary edict reverses decades of State Department practice, Time reported. Since 1992, passport applicants could choose different sex markers from what they were assigned at birth, provided they had supporting documents. The Biden adinistration added a third option, X, for intersex, nonbinary and gender-nonconforming people.

Gessen, the NYT columnist who uses X on their passport, said the “consequences for Americans who travel abroad can be dire. If your appearance does not match your gender presentation, you may be unable to move across borders or board planes. No airline wants to take the risk of transporting people who aren’t who they say they are.”

Gessen, who grew up in the Soviet Union and has written extensively about repression in autocratic societies, said “state-issued documents aren’t just tools to allow identification; they’re also tools to enforce hierarchies.”

The point of Trump’s executive order “was not to restore ‘historical facts’ but to enforce a gendered social hierarchy and to punish those who do not conform to it.”

Without a high court that will challenge the administration’s human rights abuses on this and many other fronts, Americans can look only to the ballot box for relief. They began to speak on Tuesday.

Among the major Democratic victories last week, Pennsylvania saw the election of its first openly transgender mayor, Eria Deuso. With the right wing waging a national war against transgender people, it is significant that Deuso won this election in a landslide, 64 percent versus her Republican opponent’s 35 percent.

In a statement posted following her victory, Deuso said, “Being elected as Pennsylvania’s first openly transgender mayor is deeply meaningful, and I carry that responsibility with pride and humility. I hope it reminds anyone who has ever felt unseen, unheard, or underestimated that your voice matters, and that you belong in the room where decisions are made.”

Another damaging federal court ruling, in the 6th Circuit, struck down an Ohio school district policy that barred students from intentionally misgendering other students or using other discriminatory language toward transgender students. The ruling stems from a two-year court battle brought by the right-wing organization, Parents Defending Education.

The plaintiffs argued that students have the right to use incorrect pronouns for other students as a matter of free speech, invoking both the First and Fourteenth amendments. The en banc ruling by the Republican-majority court, sets a worrying precedent for future cases of hate speech and discriminatory language.

In effect, the concurring judges conferred free speech protections on certain pronouns – the ones they see as “biological” – while withholding it for others.

Assigned Media is one hundred percent supported by our readers. Become a member today and get a members-only essay by founder Evan Urquhart every Thursday.

This article was downloaded from https://www.assignedmedia.org/breaking-news/scotus-trans-passports-pennsylvania-mayor-court-pronouns-bullying at Nov 14, 2025, 11:29 AM EST.

Table of Contents

Assigned Media: 2025 Nov 14

All articles

TWIBS: Kristi Noem Sued by Trans TSA Officer

Susan’s Place Avoids Shutting Down

What Future for Trans Media?

Transgender and Intersex Athletes May be Banned from the Olympics Next Year

Corporate Media’s Queer Purge

An Immediate Need to Impose Bigotry: Rogue Court Endorses Trump’s Ideology